The Deadeye Journal


According to some, night-sights are beneficial for only short periods of time or in very narrowly defined places.  They are wrong. 

Click the link to down-load a better researched opinion on the usefulness of night-sights.


Read this.

Let it sink in.

For almost a decade I have been presenting three slides.

The first of the three slides declares the first and most important step in cleaning any gun is to UNLOAD THE GUN.

The second slide proves to you that bullets go through walls.

The third slide teaches you how to unload the gun: remove the magazine, cycle the action, verify an empty chamber.

I have also opined that, "I was cleaning my gun," is often a convenient lie to avoid admitting to other worse (negligent or criminal) behaviors.   I have sympathy for this family and father, but this was an avoidable tragedy.

The caliber debate is ridiculous.

Chris Baker at Lucky Gunner did a bang-up job testing defensive ammo and publishing the results in October of 2015. 

I reviewed the results and ultimately exported them to a spreadsheet for better analysis.  I excluded from the results ammunition which failed to meet two standards.  The first is the FBI standard of 12" minimum penetration in ballistic gelatin.  If the ammunition did not penetrate at least 12" it was tossed.  The logic was that people would not risk carrying ammunition which failed to penetrate deep enough to stop bad-guys.  Second, if it failed to expand to at least 1.5 times it's original diameter... gone.  The 1.5 times original diameter is a commonly used threshold and is in no way magical.  But, again, if you have 12 good choices for your 9mm that penetrate at least 12" and expanded to at least .53" from .354" why not choose one of those? 

Using that philosophy I compared the 9mm, the .40 and the .45. 

And I found no significant difference between them: 

The 9mm will give you a .61" hole which was 16.1" deep, on average.
The .40 produced a hole .69" wide which was 15.5" deep, on average.
The .45 induced a hole .79" wide which was 14.6 deep, again, on average.

The largest 9mm was .70" in diameter, the largest .40 was .82" in diameter, and the largest .45 was .85" in diameter. 

By averages, you would only get a hole which was 0.09" larger in diameter in any direction using a .45 over a 9mm.  By best example you would only get a hole 0.075" in any direction doing the same.  That's not enough of a difference for this guy to get excited about.

"Which is more important- speed or accuracy?"

I share the answer here.


It is December 18, 2015, and time for the annual end of year review.  The Deadeye Method taught 95 individual classes in calendar year 2015.  24 of the classes were small groups and 125 individuals were trained to be better, smarter, safer shooters. 

As in years past, the Basic Pistol class was the most frequent class taught.  106 students participated in the Basic Pistol class through 74 classes. 

Directed Shoots/Personalize Coaching sessions caught student attention.  The Deadeye Method taught 10 Directed Shoots for several military contractors, two US Army medics involved in the Top Medic competition, several US Air Force service members, and member of the US Navy. 

Five students elected to withstand the grueling Advanced Marksmanship class.  The remaining remaining six classes were evenly spread across Handgun Mechanics, Defensive Pistol and Home Defense classes.

The Deadeye Method received 39 Five Start Reviews this year: 41% of the classes given were deemed worthy of the additional time to tell the others that the class met all of the expectations and encouraged others to choose San Antonio's best handgun instruction.

I'd like to thank all of persons who trusted their handgun (and in a few cases, their rifle instruction) to The Deadeye Method.  Without reservation I declare I enjoyed each class and everyone of you enriched my life.

Have a merry Christmas, y'all and a very happy New Year! 


It's November 14, 2015, the day after the Muslim terror attacks in Paris, France.  The  last I heard was there were 129 dead and almost 300 wounded across six different locations. 

After news of the attacks broke, friend, veteran and fellow competitive shooter, Mike, made a post to Facebook.

Mike is one of those unassuming heroes. He is a manager of services and men in the oilfield industry. Prior to that he served in the US Army as an infantryman and sniper. He has some very interesting stories but they're not mine to tell.

I found it interesting that Mike and I gleaned onto the same idea, one I've shared for years but one I don't recall discussing with him: relying on luck is a bad strategy.  I find it unsurprising that a sniper gleaned onto the same idea I did. 

If you're awaiting the police for rescue, you are relying luck:  You're hoping that the police will arrive in time or that the bad guy will be ineffective in his attempts to kill you until the police get there.

If you're not caring a gun, you relying on luck:  You're hoping that the bad guys don't target you that day.

If you're not practicing and training you're relying on luck:  You're hoping three visits a year to the range will see you through the situation.

Failing to plan for or even admit that it is going to happen here AGAIN is relying on luck.  It has already happened here.  It will happen here again. [edited to note that it did in San Bernadino, CA]

Take Mike's advice, do some dry fire, practice your draws and reloads, work some malfunction drills,  and go do some live far. Get some practice in and schedule some training in the near future.

Don't rely on luck.


You never know what you might get at the Bullet Hole Shooting Complex.

I visited the range and noted a target with a lot of shots impacting low and right. I asked the man if someone was a lefty. He stated he was. I asked him if he knew how I intuited a left-handed shooter. He correctly stated because the shots were to the right. Then he asked what he could do about that error. Funny you should ask... 

I explained to him what he was doing and the thinking process behind it. Then I told him the proper way to think about shooting and the physical acts which support that proper thinking. The difference was significant. 

The attached picture are of targets from before and after the help he was given. At the Bullet Hole you just might get a free bit of advice from a professional instructor which radically improves your shooting. 

I'm a former Captain MP, former Deputy Sheriff, current USPSA Master class shooter and at the Bullet Hole Shooting Complex we make better, smarter, safer shooters.


Last week as I was leaving practice at The Bullet Hole I was asked to assist an SAPD officer who had failed qual twice earlier that day and was at risk of separation. If she failed the qual offered the next day she would have one last chance to pass or she would be terminated.

I stopped by the bay and offered my best advise in a crash course of fundamentals and The Deadeye Method of understanding of how to truly shoot.

The following day I received an excited text message from the range owner sharing that the officer had just scored 94 out of 100 on her qual.

I can not take full credit for her dramatic improvement- two peer officers had been coaching and offering advice before I arrived. Without a doubt, she deserves major credit for adopting and implementing the information.

However, I was the only coach who got a hug for my efforts. :-)

I suspect we all helped, but that was because we wanted her to succeed. Rumor was that all that the SAPD firearm's instructor did was offer insults and sarcasm.

At The Deadeye Method, paying to be abused is considered a deviancy.

You are an adult who has paid for a service- education and coaching. The expectation is that I will make you a better, smarter, safer shooter. That is my charge and while meeting that charge I will treat you as an intelligent adult and always in the most professional manner.

- 1 - - 2 - - 3 - - 4 -